71 | Ericsson: Part of 6 GHz should be licensed for 5G (簡訳:エリクソン:6 GHzの一部は5Gのライセンスが必要です) | ----------- | |
FierceWireless: Wireless | 2020-04-04 00:00 | ????0? | |
CTIA on Wednesday said it supports the FCC’s efforts to make the lower half of the 6 GHz band available for unlicensed use but reiterated that the United States faces a growing mid-band deficit. “It is essential that the FCC and the administration develop a roadmap to close this deficit before moving forward with plans to give away the full 1200 MHz in the 6 GHz band and further limit our few remaining options,” said CTIA Executive Vice President Brad Gillen in a statement.“Licensed spectrum in the upper 6 GHz band is necessary to ensure U.S. 5G leadership by facilitating new wireless applications and services beneficial to consumers and businesses,” said Mark Racek, senior director, Regulatory Policy at Ericsson, in a statement. “At the same time, Ericsson recognizes the need for a mix of both licensed and unlicensed spectrum and, therefore, urges the FCC to move ahead with opening the lower 6 GHz range for unlicensed use if incumbent users can be assured of protection from interference, and we request the FCC to seek additional comment on licensed use of spectrum in the 6 GHz band.”One of the reasons the 6 GHz is attractive is operators who own and control the fixed service links that are currently predominant in the band are generally supportive of using the frequencies for licensed services. Moving the current fixed users to an adjacent band would probably be easier than trying to move the incumbents in the C-band, for example, who are less gung-ho about moving. Opponents, however, argue that will take too much time.In a statement after Pai’s announcement on Wednesday, Commissioner Mike O’Rielly, who played the lead advocate role for 6 GHz, signaled his support for the chairman’s proposal, and acknowledged that the action to permit all 1,200 megahertz of the band for unlicensed services means that proposals to license portions of the band were not accepted. “I fully support this outcome, but I also remain fully committed to identifying other mid-bands for licensed services,” he said.“Simply put, U.S. wireless providers must have more mid-band spectrum to meet consumer demand, and I will fight to refill the spectrum pipeline for providers in the 6 GHz band,” he stated. “This effort is absolutely vital to preserving U.S. leadership in wireless technology and to alleviate the demands being placed on existing networks. I firmly believe that the most likely candidate bands for this purpose are federal spectrum allocations, such as the 3.1 to 3.55 GHz band, that can be converted to commercial use.” -- ???????? | |||
????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????? |
????????????