334
???????????????????????
| 334 | CCA urges FCC to consider higher-power rules for CBRS (簡訳:CCAは、FCCにCBRSのより強力なルールを検討するよう要請します) | ----------- | |
| FierceWireless: Wireless | 2021-04-14 07:00 | ????0? | |
| During a speech at the American Enterprise Institute last month, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said he’s all for the FCC seeking comment this year on increasing the power levels for CBRS operations in the 3.5 GHz band. Increasing the power levels would help align the U.S. band with international standards and create efficiencies for mid-band 5G builds in the U.S. that could span the 3.45 GHz to C-band spectrum ranges, he said.CCA told the commission that due to the relatively low EIRP of CBRS compared to other bands, if CBRS is deployed at macro cell locations, there will be a coverage gap between CBRS devices and existing mid- and low-band licensed bands, including the C-band. Power limits in CBRS are 25-28 dB lower than the power allowed in the adjacent bands, the organization said.The OnGo Alliance represents a lot of different companies in CBRS and isn’t likely to take a position on whether higher power levels are good or bad. However, OnGo Alliance President Dave Wright said if the commission is going to revisit the issue of higher power in the band, they really ought to make it part of a more comprehensive review of the CBRS rules.There’s now almost two years of commercial deployment in the band, and given what the FCC, DoD and National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA) are pursuing for the 3450-3550 MHz band, with much higher power levels and significantly less restrictions, “we would like to have a conversation about the federal incumbent protection requirements in CBBRS,” he told Fierce. For example, they’ve been extremely effective, but are they being overly cautious? -- ???????? | |||
|
????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????? |
|||
????????????